I am a bit surprised that nobody has commented on the outstanding article regarding the twisted world of Jared Loughner that ran in yesterday's New York Times. It is long, and I would post a link but I think you have to have a password to read the entire piece, so I will not. I found the following sentence very interesting in light of the almost immediate fingering of the right as the driving force behind this guy's actions:
He became intrigued by anti-government conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetuated by the government and that the country's central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of the government.
Two points here. First, I will take credit for betting Loughner was more likely a viewer of the conspiracy TV shows than a visitor at any mainstream political website. I have dug a little deeper and went to Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory website today, and sure enough, the September 11 and big bank scams are there...shockingly, there is a hint that a new conspiracy, that being Jared Loughner was not the lone gunman that was shooting at the murder scene, is unfolding...good grief. As an aside, I find it interesting that the word 'scam' is used prominently on the Conspiracy Theory website. This word was one of Loughner's favorites-his education was, in his words, a scam. His bank was a scam. Not being able to enlist in the military was a scam. Coincidence? Maybe but I doubt it. Second point-If Palin, Limbaugh, Beck at al were in Loughner's brain, why did he bristle at the site of Bush?
A calm analysis later in the paper produced a valid conclusion regarding American reaction to spectacular news events. In essence, it said that historically all Americans pretty much got their news from one or two sources and came to their own conclusions over the periods of days to weeks to years. Contrast that with today; when news breaks, and instinctively one goes to one of their two or three trusted sources, be they Fox News, Daily Kos, Drudge, Huffington, MSNBC, and inevitably one of these sources will produce an opinion or spin that will resonate as rational and absolute truth within the preconditioned belief set of the media patron. All sense of reason is gone and the big debate is on.
At any rate, it was a great read, I suggest everyone pick up a copy of yesterday's New York Times.