• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

BCC buys parcel in Miramar

New posts
Bert Harris claims are excluded by the insurance carrier.

$550,000 straight out of the "Land Account" (per Pennington with the Clerk's Office) of the BCC. In other words straight out of the taxpayers pocket.

We have several cases either under litigation or in the process of being filed that are very similar in nature (Bert Harris claims).

Time will tell but from what I have seen, all of them have good chances of getting a favorable jury verdict, if the county doesn't settle before hand.
 
Bert Harris claims are excluded by the insurance carrier.

$550,000 straight out of the "Land Account" (per Pennington with the Clerk's Office) of the BCC. In other words straight out of the taxpayers pocket.

We have several cases either under litigation or in the process of being filed that are very similar in nature (Bert Harris claims).

Time will tell but from what I have seen, all of them have good chances of getting a favorable jury verdict, if the county doesn't settle before hand.

So in other words a broke county is about to go bankrupt?
 
Bert Harris claims are excluded by the insurance carrier.

$550,000 straight out of the "Land Account" (per Pennington with the Clerk's Office) of the BCC. In other words straight out of the taxpayers pocket.

We have several cases either under litigation or in the process of being filed that are very similar in nature (Bert Harris claims).

Time will tell but from what I have seen, all of them have good chances of getting a favorable jury verdict, if the county doesn't settle before hand.


So they lied in the meeting where it said if they settle then the insurance would cover some of the bill. The Min. said 1/3 of the bill. Is this not True??????
 
So they lied in the meeting where it said if they settle then the insurance would cover some of the bill. The Min. said 1/3 of the bill. Is this not True??????

I read this twice again. It is astounding to me that while the BCC was negotiating what they might do to who and talking about baiting, etc. that none of them cleared up the issue of whether they had insurance coverage for the settlement.

Someone smarter than me said:

Where the liability of a person for their debts is eroded, it brings the relationship to borrowed money even closer to the relationship that can be observed between elected officials in government--who have little or no accountability attached to the money they have charge over--and tax revenues.
 
So they lied in the meeting where it said if they settle then the insurance would cover some of the bill. The Min. said 1/3 of the bill. Is this not True??????


As of 12/18 the insurance company has not made any payment to the county that I am aware of.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top