Smiling JOe
SoWal Expert
No wonder I was putting off reading this thread. What a trainwreck. Someone says that they were taught better, yet they do not as they were taught.
As I understand the m vs k issue, M is the Roman numeral for 1,000. M is also French for mil, which translates to 1,000. K represents kilobyte, or 1024 bytes, which loosely translates to 1,000 for many non-computer geeks. Computer geeks would never use K to represent anything other than 1024 x y (y=the variable number in front of the k). The problem in communicating k and m is that if you put an m behind a number for most people, they think you mean million. Why? Because in our world of technology, M represents a MegaByte, or 1,024,000 bytes, often thought of as 1,000,000 by us non-tech geeks, and the metric peeps. That is why it is important to clarify language sometimes, no different than setting appointments for meetings with people coming from a different time zone. Communication is important to us all. Using an m vs a k, doesn't make one more or less important. It's just what they do and know.
As I understand the m vs k issue, M is the Roman numeral for 1,000. M is also French for mil, which translates to 1,000. K represents kilobyte, or 1024 bytes, which loosely translates to 1,000 for many non-computer geeks. Computer geeks would never use K to represent anything other than 1024 x y (y=the variable number in front of the k). The problem in communicating k and m is that if you put an m behind a number for most people, they think you mean million. Why? Because in our world of technology, M represents a MegaByte, or 1,024,000 bytes, often thought of as 1,000,000 by us non-tech geeks, and the metric peeps. That is why it is important to clarify language sometimes, no different than setting appointments for meetings with people coming from a different time zone. Communication is important to us all. Using an m vs a k, doesn't make one more or less important. It's just what they do and know.

