PoppaJ
SoWal Insider
You are less then

You are less then

No, raiding the house of a man who has stolen goverment materials labeled as high as TOP SECRET SCI is as far from politcal as it gets. It's what anyone would expect.Here is every comment, When did I say that law enforcement is playing politics? The foot soldiers are just doing their jobs.
The AG is 100% playing politics because suing Trump is what she ran on. She is trying to advance her political standing with this suit. She has an axe to grind
Who is the victim in the crime she has brought forth? What is the actual crime? Im talking actual statute not emotional justice? How many other people that have committed whatever crime she is pushing have been prosecuted? What was the outcome?
Do you think raiding Trumps house wasn't a political stunt? Do you think sending immigrants to MV wasn't a political stunt?
How am I lying?
Seems they did try to handle it differently. If the story is right, the Government asked for their stuff back. Seems former President Trump and his lawyer even alluded to the fact they didn't have to do the search as there were negotiations ongoing about returning files.First read the link from Poppa and I think you're wrong
Second stop using the word parse wrong
So you don't think the FBI raid was political? It couldn't have been handled another way?
If thats the case then Desantis is a like a travel agent
The attorney, Alina Habba, told a New York State court that on May 5, she conducted a search of Trump’s private residence and office at Mar-a-Lago that was so “diligent” it included “all desks, drawers, nightstands, dressers, closets, etc.” She was looking for records in response to a subpoena issued by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating matters related to the Trump Organization.Seems they did try to handle it differently. If the story is right, the Government asked for their stuff back. Seems former President Trump and his lawyer even alluded to the fact they didn't have to do the search as there were negotiations ongoing about returning files.
I'm having a hard time following this. Is this saying Letitia had a subpoena to search Mara Lago, and that the search was conducted by Trump's attorney, Alina Habba?The attorney, Alina Habba, told a New York State court that on May 5, she conducted a search of Trump’s private residence and office at Mar-a-Lago that was so “diligent” it included “all desks, drawers, nightstands, dressers, closets, etc.” She was looking for records in response to a subpoena issued by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating matters related to the Trump Organization.
The same filing also includes an affidavit from Trump himself, indicating that he “authorized Alina Habba to search my private residence and personal office located at The Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida for any and all documents responsive to the Subpoena.” Habba indicated she conducted similar searches at Trump’s residences and office at his Bedminster estate.
An informant told the DOJ they were lying.
This is separate from the NY lawsuit. I know there are so many it’s confusing.I'm having a hard time following this. Is this saying Letitia had a subpoena to search Mara Lago, and that the search was conducted by Trump's attorney, Alina Habba?
Lititia's office was involved because several of these sites were in New York is what I am surmising.This is separate from the NY lawsuit. I know there are so many it’s confusing.
This is NARA wanting the documents back trump stole.
The subpoena was for those documents and trump and his attorneys said there were none to be found.
Shockingly they were lying as proven by an informant.
Agreed.Just for my own purposes, I have tried to condense the "espionage case" into a condensed version. This is what it looks like to me (so far) :
DOJ Case:
Trump had government documents (regardless of classified status) that he was not authorized to possess – Trump had admitted he had the documents multiple times
Trump was formally, legally, requested to return documents – he refused, repeatedly – Documented
DOJ recovered these documents from Trump’s night club – Documented
He had been ordered to show cause why he had a reason to possess them- he has not complied
______
Trump’s defense:
(1) I declassified them – doesn’t provide any proof – but, it doesn’t matter, possession of the documents is a crime
(2) I didn’t know they were there – he has admitted ordering them taken: some of them found in his desk
(3) FBI planted them – he has been asked by the special master to provide proof – he has not complied
Bu, bu, but messiah trump says he had the power to pray away classifications.Just for my own purposes, I have tried to condense the "espionage case" into a condensed version. This is what it looks like to me (so far) :
DOJ Case:
Trump had, in his possession, government documents (regardless of classified status), that he was not authorized to possess – Trump has admitted he had the documents multiple times
Trump was formally, legally, requested to return the documents – he refused, repeatedly – Documented
DOJ recovered these documents from Trump’s night club – Documented
He has been ordered by the special master to show cause why he had a reason to possess them- he has not complied
______
Trump’s defense:
(1) I declassified them – doesn’t provide any proof – but, it doesn’t matter, possession of the documents, regardless if they are classified or not, is a crime
(2) I didn’t know they were there – he has admitted ordering them taken: some of them found in his desk
(3) FBI planted them – he has been asked by the special master to provide proof – he has not complied