I guess I'm quite ignorant about overall political strategy, specifically the mind-set of how this Thread was started. Someone please help me understand, educate me.
Is it not true that whichever Sheriff candidate collects the most support (votes) wins the primary election fair and square? Two or 20 Candidates?
I've heard the term "dilute(d)" until I'm sick of it. That political garbage aside, four years ago Sheriff Johnson collected more votes than any other Republican in the primary. Why? Does more votes equal more support? Votes of Confidence maybe?
Whether those who have used, and/or will use the "dilute(d)" term have something going or not, seems to me these same folks are basically identifying a certain percentage of voters as voting unintelligently (just stupid). For example, hear John Doe at the polls and about to vote: Let?s see (John Doe thinks to himself), I think I will vote for?uh, uh, the incumbent of course; especially since all the talk about him doing such a horrible job; all those road signs, newspaper advertisements, fancy websites, mailings, promises, etc., etc., none of those other candidates can improve anything? yeap, I?ll vote for the incumbent.
Well, maybe so? Regardless, I say most votes equal most support, or visa versa, strategy or not.
So to all Sheriff Candidates: Don't give up, battle it out. Whoever of you gets the most votes, wins.